This article contains spoilers for Silo Season 1.
Returning for a second season, Silo has captivated audiences with its unique take on a post-apocalyptic world, first brought to life in the gripping novels by Hugh Howey and now reimagined in the TV adaptation starring Rebecca Ferguson. Both versions explore the mysteries of an underground society, survival, and the human spirit’s resilience in a confined, hidden world. While the TV series remains faithful to the core themes of Howey’s story, the transition from page to screen brings significant differences that add new layers to the narrative.
🤩 📺 SIGN UP for Parade’s Daily newsletter & get the scoop on the latest TV news & celebrity interviews delivered right to your inbox 🤩🎥
This article dives into the most notable changes between the book series and the show, from character changes to plot adjustments, offering insights into how each medium handles the story’s essential elements. Fans of the novels will recognize familiar moments. But some surprises await in the TV adaptation, giving the story fresh depth for returning and new audiences alike.
Related: Will There Be a ‘Ted Lasso’ Spinoff?
The Syndrome
In the Silo TV adaptation, “The Syndrome” is introduced as a mysterious and feared illness affecting the underground society. The disease, which causes uncontrollable tremors and deteriorating motor skills, becomes personal when Paul (Chinaza Uche), the original choice for sheriff and eventual deputy, is secretly living with the condition.
Initially named Peter in the books (likely renamed to avoid having the same name as Juliette’s father), Paul’s condition adds depth to the character by having him withhold this information for fear he’d be cast out. Many fans of the show have begun claiming their own theories about what the disease might be, with ideas ranging from a Vitamin D deficiency to a genetic condition. By having Paul live with the condition, the show gives a major show character a constant reminder of the silo’s fragility and an underlying sense of urgency, raising the stakes for his survival and adding layers to his complex relationship with the silo’s power structure
Walker’s gender swap
Played by multi-time Emmy nominee Harriet Walter in the Apple TV+ show, Walker was originally depicted in Hugh Howey’s Silo book series as an older man working in Mechanical. The reason for this change is straightforward yet impactful. In an interview with Collider, show creator Graham Yost explained that he wanted Juliette to have a strong maternal figure, someone who could offer emotional guidance and support in a world where mentors are rare, especially for a young woman navigating the silo’s many challenges.
Casting Walker as a woman not only deepened her relationship with Juliette, but also opened the door to bringing in Walter, known for her critically acclaimed roles in Ted Lasso and Succession. Walter’s nuanced portrayal of Walker adds a warmth and resilience to the character, enhancing Juliette’s journey and bringing fresh emotional layers to the series. This decision also allowed the adaptation to incorporate Walter’s gravitas, giving Silo a compelling character dynamic that resonates with audiences in new ways.
More intertwined stories
In the Silo TV adaptation, the characters’ lives and stories are more woven together than in the original book series. For instance, while Juliette’s boyfriend, George (Ferdinand Kingsley), is only briefly mentioned in the books, his presence in the show has a far-reaching impact on her journey. This expanded relationship with George provides Juliette with personal stakes that make her pursuit of truth more urgent and emotionally charged, adding dimension to her motivations. She is determined to figure out what he knew and why he was killed. The adaptation uses George’s storyline to build suspense and draw viewers into Juliette’s world, showing how his disappearance fuels her determination to uncover the secrets of the silo.
Additionally, the TV series strengthens the relationship between Juliette and Holston (David Oyelowo), the previous Sheriff, which was largely absent in the books. By establishing a bond between the two, the show creates a mentor-mentee dynamic that further enriches Juliette’s path as she steps into her new role. Holston’s early death and the connection he shared with Juliette add gravity to her taking on the position, setting up a continuity that feels both personal and communal. These interconnected stories help build a more cohesive narrative, emphasizing how individual choices ripple through the silo’s society and connect the characters’ fates in complex ways.
Related: ‘Slow Horses’ Returns for Season 5–Much Sooner Than Expected!
The Relics
The concept of banned relics doesn’t play a significant role in the books. In fact, the characters often reference reading children’s books that were available to them while in the silo. The adaptation introduces these forbidden objects—items from the past world that hold memories and clues about life outside the silo—as a way to deepen the mystery of the silo’s origins. By banning relics, the authorities maintain control, stifling curiosity and reinforcing the isolation of the silo’s residents.
This addition adds an extra layer of tension, as characters like Juliette risk punishment for holding or seeking out these relics, underscoring the oppressive nature of their society. These items represent knowledge and history that the residents are denied. Characters who come into contact with relics develop a stronger sense of suspicion and rebellion, pushing them to question the silo’s official narrative. It also is a fun “Easter Egg” for fans as they watch the characters try to make sense of a Pez dispenser.
Bernard’s villainy
In the Silo book series, Bernard (played by Tim Robbins in the show) is a much more overt villain, marking him as a clear antagonist from the outset. His ruthless nature is highlighted through his direct involvement in the murders of Mayor Jahns (played by Geraldine James) and Deputy Marnes (played by Will Patton), actions that demonstrate his willingness to eliminate anyone challenging his authority. Bernard’s book persona radiates intimidation and cunning, reinforcing his role as a villain and creating a palpable tension for both characters and readers.
In the TV adaptation, however, Bernard’s motives and actions are more nuanced, giving him an ambiguous persona. While he remains a powerful figure, the show portrays him with moments of restraint, leaving his intentions open to interpretation until his true nature is finally revealed. The show clearly wanted to add more mystery to the story than the books, and used the Head of IT and the eventual Mayor to do just that.
Next, Peter Sarsgaard on Having It Out With Brother-In-Law Jake Gyllenhaal in ‘Presumed Innocent’.