Canadian ReviewsCanadian Reviews
  • What’s On
  • Reviews
  • Digital World
  • Lifestyle
  • Travel
  • Trending
  • Web Stories
Trending Now

A Transfer Guide On £345 A Month

Workshops by Request (Sundre): Acting with Evan Medd – Peak Theatre Players, Theater News

A gorgeous recreation of a stealth masterpiece

Long Story Short, Netflix’s funny new cartoon, is like a rich family novel | Canada Voices

U.K. Inflation Rises to 3.8% in July 2025

Numbrix 9 – August 22

Hotel Benchmarking in Action: Lessons from SHaDPitch Participants

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
Canadian ReviewsCanadian Reviews
  • What’s On
  • Reviews
  • Digital World
  • Lifestyle
  • Travel
  • Trending
  • Web Stories
Newsletter
Canadian ReviewsCanadian Reviews
You are at:Home » Appeals court throws out Trump’s $500-million civil fraud penalty
Lifestyle

Appeals court throws out Trump’s $500-million civil fraud penalty

21 August 20253 Mins Read

(BBC News) An appeals court has thrown out a $500-million penalty that President Donald Trump was ordered to pay in a New York civil fraud trial last year.

Judge Arthur Engoron had ordered Trump to pay the fee for massively inflating the value of the Trump Organization’s properties in order to secure favourable loans.

In the lengthy ruling released on Thursday, judges on the New York Supreme Court’s Appellate Division stated that while Trump was liable for the fraud, the fine of nearly a half-billion dollars was excessive and probably violated constitutional protections against severe punishment.

In the case, Judge Engoron had ordered Trump to pay $355 million, but with interest, that grew to more than $500 million.

“While harm certainly occurred, it was not the cataclysmic harm that can justify a nearly half billion-dollar award to the state,” wrote Judge Peter Moulton.

In a post on his social media site, Truth Social, Trump claimed the decision was a “total victory”.

“I greatly respect the fact that the Court had the Courage to throw out this unlawful and disgraceful Decision that was hurting Business all throughout New York State,” he said. “It was a Political Witch Hunt, in a business sense, the likes of which no one has ever seen before.”

The New York Attorney General’s Office, which brought the case against Trump, also framed the decision as a win, as it upheld Trump’s fraud liability and the judges did not throw out other penalties that were not financial. The office plans to appeal against the decision on the fine to the state’s highest court, the Court of Appeals.

In a statement, the attorney general’s office said the judges “affirmed the well-supported finding of the trial court: Donald Trump, his company, and two of his children are liable for fraud.”

“It should not be lost to history: yet another court has ruled that the president violated the law, and that our case has merit,” it also said.

In the case against Trump, his two adult sons, and the Trump Organization, Judge Engoron also banned Trump from serving as a company director or taking out loans from banks in the state for three years.

Thursday’s decision kept in place this and other non-monetary penalties that Judge Engoron imposed.

The 323-page ruling, which included three lengthy opinions, revealed disagreement among the five judges on the panel.

They were primarily divided over the merits of the original lawsuit brought by Letitia James, who had accused Trump and his sons of “persistent and repeated fraud”.

While several judges said she was “within her lawful power in bringing this action”, one believed the case should have been dismissed and two said that there should be a new trial of a more limited scope.

Those two, though, joined the decision to throw out the fine “for the sole purpose of ensuring finality,” wrote Judge Moulton.

American voters had “obviously rendered a verdict” on Trump’s political career, Judge Moulton also wrote, and “this bench today unanimously derails the effort to destroy his business.”

The ruling came almost a year after the panel heard oral arguments on the appeal, during which several judges appeared skeptical of the civil fraud case.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y09q1zgg8o

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Email

Related Articles

A Transfer Guide On £345 A Month

Lifestyle 22 August 2025

A gorgeous recreation of a stealth masterpiece

Lifestyle 22 August 2025

Long Story Short, Netflix’s funny new cartoon, is like a rich family novel | Canada Voices

Lifestyle 22 August 2025

Numbrix 9 – August 22

Lifestyle 22 August 2025

Arco makes the case as fall 2025’s most anticipated animated film with new trailer

Lifestyle 22 August 2025

NYT Connections Sports Edition Today: Hints and Answers for Friday, August 22

Lifestyle 22 August 2025
Top Articles

These Ontario employers were just ranked among best in Canada

17 July 2025262 Views

What Time Are the Tony Awards? How to Watch for Free

8 June 2025155 Views

Getting a taste of Maori culture in New Zealand’s overlooked Auckland | Canada Voices

12 July 2025136 Views

The ocean’s ‘sparkly glow’: Here’s where to witness bioluminescence in B.C. 

14 August 2025111 Views
Demo
Don't Miss
Lifestyle 22 August 2025

Numbrix 9 – August 22

Numbrix 9 – August 22

Hotel Benchmarking in Action: Lessons from SHaDPitch Participants

Arco makes the case as fall 2025’s most anticipated animated film with new trailer

Hotels Leverage Guest Data to Enhance Experiential Travel Offerings

About Us
About Us

Canadian Reviews is your one-stop website for the latest Canadian trends and things to do, follow us now to get the news that matters to you.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube WhatsApp
Our Picks

A Transfer Guide On £345 A Month

Workshops by Request (Sundre): Acting with Evan Medd – Peak Theatre Players, Theater News

A gorgeous recreation of a stealth masterpiece

Most Popular

Why You Should Consider Investing with IC Markets

28 April 202424 Views

OANDA Review – Low costs and no deposit requirements

28 April 2024345 Views

LearnToTrade: A Comprehensive Look at the Controversial Trading School

28 April 202448 Views
© 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact us

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.