Canadian ReviewsCanadian Reviews
  • What’s On
  • Reviews
  • Digital World
  • Lifestyle
  • Travel
  • Trending
  • Web Stories
Trending Now

Details remain limited after midshipman shot amid confusion, reports of threat at Naval Academy

We compared meat prices at different Montreal grocery stores & the difference is shocking

New French movie about couture is cut from a different cloth | Canada Voices

The Nintendo Switch 2’s year-one game lineup keeps getting stranger

Jelly Roll’s Wife Reveals Weight Loss Journey of Her Own in New Body ‘Transformation’ Video

A phone line during the pandemic that morphed into a clinic providing culturally safe care in downtown Toronto | Canada Voices

Ally Pankiw takes on Lilith Fair to show how the festival paved the way for female artists | Canada Voices

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
Canadian ReviewsCanadian Reviews
  • What’s On
  • Reviews
  • Digital World
  • Lifestyle
  • Travel
  • Trending
  • Web Stories
Newsletter
Canadian ReviewsCanadian Reviews
You are at:Home » Sam Altman is right and wrong about the future of photos Canada reviews
Reviews

Sam Altman is right and wrong about the future of photos Canada reviews

12 August 20254 Mins Read

I’m annoyed, not for the first time, by something Sam Altman has said. But this time it’s because I’m annoyed at how much I agree with what he’s saying — even though I think his statement is kind of bullshit.

In a recent interview, journalist Cleo Abram asked Altman how people will be able to tell what’s real and what’s not in an age of convincing AI-generated content. Specifically, she references the bunnies. You know the ones I mean: caught in some Ring-camera-ish footage of a backyard, discovering and jumping on a trampoline. So cute! So wholesome! So completely AI-generated! The video went viral, almost certainly before the people liking and sharing it realized that it was AI.

So what happens as the technology improves and AI content is everywhere? How will we know what’s real? Eh, we might not, Altman seems to say. By way of an example, he points a finger at something I spend a lot of time thinking about: phone cameras.

“Even a photo you take out of your iPhone today, it’s like, mostly real but it’s a little not,” he tells Abram. So much processing happens between the photons hitting an image sensor and the final image, he says, and what we end up with is a kind of optimized version of reality. And sure, he’s right. Any old digital camera makes a million decisions about a scene: contrast, sharpness, which pixels should be red and which ones are green. A phone camera goes a lot further, combining data from different frames, deciphering what’s the ground and what’s the sky, and brightening faces to look a little more flattering.

Altman’s point is that we accept this level of manipulation as “real,” even though we know there’s more going on. As AI content becomes more commonplace, “I think the threshold for how real does it have to be to be considered to be real will just keep moving,” he says. That’s when I started clenching my jaw.

For starters, there’s a big difference between a photo that starts with photons hitting a sensor and one that is fabricated from scratch with generative AI. If they exist on a spectrum, then it’s pretty god damn big spectrum. I also think that most people aren’t aware of what kind of processing happens when they take a picture with a phone, and it’s not as liberal as his statements suggest. Your iPhone camera isn’t in the business of changing details or adding things that weren’t there. Even when it seems to be doing something screwy, the explanation is usually pretty simple. Sure, sometimes demon face happens. AI moon is one thing, and you can get wild with Google Photos’ gen-AI editing tools. But I haven’t seen evidence of the cameras themselves going rogue and adding elements that weren’t there in the last five years of testing every major phone on the US market.

Invoking phone camera processing as an example of an acceptable un-reality is annoying, but I think Altman is generally right. Our understanding of what is real and what isn’t changed when Photoshop took off. I know all kinds of staging and editing goes into a magazine cover photo, but I still accept a picture of Sarah Jessica Parker on the cover of Vogue as “real.” This understanding has already changed in the AI era when we look at a picture on social media, or an ad, or a product listing — and that will only continue. But Altman implies that as our definition of “real” or “real enough” changes, we’ll appreciate it all the same as something we see with our own eyes. After all, we enjoy science fiction movies even though we know they’re not real, he points out.

But I think that we’re still going to care whether something is real or not and calibrate our enjoyment accordingly. The video of the bunnies on the trampoline is so much less enjoyable when you know it’s not real. The whole premise of the the thing is “look at the funny thing these rabbits did.” That’s only funny if it’s real! If social media becomes awash with cute but unreal videos, I don’t think I’m going to stop caring and just enjoy them. I think I’m going to stop enjoying that social media app. Who knows? Maybe I’ll be spending more time with an LTE smartwatch and less time with my phone in the future.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Email

Related Articles

Exit 8’s director was inspired by watching people play the game Canada reviews

Reviews 13 September 2025

“Dead Man’s Wire” Excels in its Underdog Wiring of Deadly Wit and Electricity – front mezz junkies, Theater News

Reviews 13 September 2025

Tucker Carlson asks Sam Altman if an OpenAI employee was murdered ‘on your orders’ Canada reviews

Reviews 12 September 2025

Elon Musk is trying to silence Microsoft employees who criticize Charlie Kirk Canada reviews

Reviews 12 September 2025

Congress Republicans want to target liberal donors after Charlie Kirk’s death Canada reviews

Reviews 12 September 2025

The WSJ carelessly spread anti-trans misinformation Canada reviews

Reviews 12 September 2025
Top Articles

The ocean’s ‘sparkly glow’: Here’s where to witness bioluminescence in B.C. 

14 August 2025273 Views

These Ontario employers were just ranked among best in Canada

17 July 2025268 Views

Getting a taste of Maori culture in New Zealand’s overlooked Auckland | Canada Voices

12 July 2025138 Views

The Mother May I Story – Chickpea Edition

18 May 202496 Views
Demo
Don't Miss
Lifestyle 13 September 2025

A phone line during the pandemic that morphed into a clinic providing culturally safe care in downtown Toronto | Canada Voices

Open this photo in gallery:Clarissa Larson attends a prenatal visit at Call Auntie with midwife…

Ally Pankiw takes on Lilith Fair to show how the festival paved the way for female artists | Canada Voices

Exit 8’s director was inspired by watching people play the game Canada reviews

13th Sep: How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World (2019), 1hr 44m [PG] – Streaming Again (6.7/10)

About Us
About Us

Canadian Reviews is your one-stop website for the latest Canadian trends and things to do, follow us now to get the news that matters to you.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube WhatsApp
Our Picks

Details remain limited after midshipman shot amid confusion, reports of threat at Naval Academy

We compared meat prices at different Montreal grocery stores & the difference is shocking

New French movie about couture is cut from a different cloth | Canada Voices

Most Popular

Why You Should Consider Investing with IC Markets

28 April 202424 Views

OANDA Review – Low costs and no deposit requirements

28 April 2024345 Views

LearnToTrade: A Comprehensive Look at the Controversial Trading School

28 April 202449 Views
© 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact us

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.